SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR QHHT WITH SUSPECTED ALIEN OR MILITARY ABDUCTEES
Pre-Session Interview Protocols
What to Keep in Mind When Working With Specific Individuals
This protocol is intended for specific populations who may present with layered trauma, dissociation, memory compartmentalization, or anomalous experiential patterns. These individuals often require additional care, neutrality, and safety measures prior to any regression or QHHT-style work.
Below is a brief overview of the primary categories this protocol addresses.
MK-Ultra and Trauma-Based Mind Control Survivors
Individuals exposed to systematic psychological conditioning, often beginning in childhood, involving hypnosis, dissociation, fear-based programming, and memory fragmentation. These experiences frequently result in compartmentalized identities, amnesia, hypervigilance, and internal alarm systems that activate when certain topics are approached.
MILAB (Military Abduction) Experiencers
People who report encounters involving human-led military or intelligence personnel, often in covert settings, sometimes overlapping with non-human or anomalous experiences. These individuals may present with missing time, military-style environments in dreams or flashbacks, familiarity with advanced technology, and strong authority-related triggers.
“20 and Back” Program Recruits
Individuals who report participation in long-duration off-world or covert programs, followed by age regression, memory erasure or reintegration into their original life timeline. Common indicators include unexplained skill sets, time distortion, body memory without narrative recall, odd sensations, and profound identity disorientation.
Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) Survivors
Those exposed to organized, repeated ritualized abuse, often beginning in early childhood, designed to fracture identity and suppress memory. These individuals frequently present with complex dissociative structures, intense shame or guilt without clear origin, phobic responses to symbols or dates, and deeply embedded fear conditioning.
Supersoldier & Secret Space Program (SSP) Participants
Individuals who report involvement in highly compartmentalized programs involving combat training, technological interfacing, or off-planet assignments. They may demonstrate sudden access to tactical knowledge, disciplined emotional suppression, dissociative shutdowns, and strong resistance to introspection around mission-related topics.
Alien Abductees
Individuals who report encounters involving non-human intelligences, often characterized by missing time, medical or examination-type environments, paralysis, telepathic communication, and highly vivid sensory recall. These experiences may occur consciously, during altered states, or through fragmented memory and dreams. Many present with screen memories, physiological markers, deep emotional responses without narrative context, and long-term consistency in experiential themes across decades.
Why These Categories Require Specialized Screening
Individuals within these groups often:
Do not present as consciously aware of the full scope of their experiences
May have protective psychological structures in place
Can destabilize if memory access is forced or premature
The goal is information gathering, safety assessment, and containment — not interpretation, diagnosis, or memory recovery.
These guidelines help you:
Establish a psychological baseline
Identify potential risk factors before a QHHT session
Avoid premature triggering or destabilization
Maintain ethical and therapeutic safety
1. Sleep Pattern Assessment
Explore the full spectrum of sleep experiences, not just duration or quality.
Inquire about:
Chronic insomnia or irregular sleep cycles
Sudden awakenings at consistent times (especially 2–4 AM)
Persistent exhaustion despite adequate sleep
Sleep paralysis indicators:
Sensation of pressure on the chest
Inability to move or speak
Awareness of presences in the room
Additional observations:
Avoidance of certain sleep positions or rooms
Rigid or compulsive bedtime rituals
Signs of nocturnal disturbance without conscious recall
Document patterns carefully without suggesting explanations.
2. Dream & Memory Investigation
Repetitive Dreams
Encourage detailed descriptions without leading questions.
Common recurring themes may include:
Medical or examination environments with bright lighting
Inability to move or speak
Floating or suspension sensations
Geometric symbols or patterns
Authority figures in uniforms
Non-human entities
Underground facilities, enclosed bases or starship environments
Feelings of being observed, evaluated, or tested
Note dreams described as “more real than real.”
Pay attention to long-term consistency, as authentic memory fragments tend to remain stable over time.
Amusement Park & Shopping Mall Dreams
These specific dream scenarios often serve as screen memories—mental constructs that mask more traumatic experiences.
Ask about:
Rides or structures that don’t appear normal
Areas that feel restricted, off-limits, or endless
Overly bright or artificial lighting
A sense of being guided or monitored
Document whether:
The locations feel familiar despite no waking-life reference
The subject insists on literal reality despite inconsistencies
3. Vivid Flashbacks
Differentiate flashbacks from intrusive thoughts.
True flashbacks often include:
Sensory elements: antiseptic, ozone, metallic smells
Tactile sensations: cold surfaces, needle pricks
Auditory cues: humming, beeping, mechanical sounds
Emotional intensity disproportionate to known experiences
Ask about triggers such as:
Medical environments
Specific sounds or frequencies
Helicopters or aircraft
Particular times of night
4. Missing Time Episodes
Approach this section with care and neutrality.
Explore:
Childhood memory gaps others recall clearly
Vacations or trips where time doesn’t add up
Entire job periods with little recollection
Military or government contract service gaps
Short commutes that inexplicably take hours
Note:
Attempts to investigate these gaps
Emotional or physiological responses when discussed
(sweating, rapid heartbeat, anxiety)
5. Psychological Baseline Assessment
Fear Inventory
Beyond asking “what fears do you have,” explore irrational or disproportionate fears that don’t connect to known trauma:
Examples:
Fear of medical or neurological examinations
Fear of needles or bloodwork
Being alone at night
Authority figures in uniform
Specific symbols or geometric patterns
Certain locations with no clear cause
Looking at the night sky or aircraft
Sudden adult-onset phobias without clear triggers are especially important to note.
Mood Patterns & PTSD Screening
Assess for complex PTSD indicators, including:
Hypervigilance
Exaggerated startle response
Emotional numbing or detachment
Relationship instability
Dissociation or depersonalization
Intrusive thoughts or images
Unexplained shame or guilt
Ask about self-destructive behaviors, substance use, or compulsive activities that might serve as coping mechanisms. Follow this list:
Self-destructive behaviors or suicidal thoughts
Substance use
Previous diagnoses or treatments
Keep in mind that conventional PTSD frameworks may not address all layers of experience.
6. Understanding Complex Personality Systems
Compartmentalization Indicators
Subjects who have undergone systematic trauma-based programming or who have experienced repeated anomalous encounters may present with distinct personality compartments, each with limited access to the others’ memories.
This cannot be overstated: Do not offer explanations, interpretations, or reassurances during the initial interview phase, even if patterns seem obvious to you. There are several crucial reasons for this restraint:
First, you may not be speaking with the integrated personality. In cases of trauma-based mind control or severe dissociation, the personality presenting to you may be a protective alter, a programmed response system, or a handler-installed interface designed to deflect investigation. Offering explanations to this personality can trigger defensive protocols that will shut down the session, cause the subject to flee treatment, or activate crisis responses.
Second, premature interpretation can contaminate memories and create false confidence in conclusions that may not be accurate. The subject needs space to discover their own truth through the QHHT process rather than adopting your framework.
Third, showing your hand too early may trigger alarm systems if the subject has been programmed to respond to specific terminology or concepts
Watch for:
Sudden shifts in voice, posture, or vocabulary
Inconsistent answers to the same question
Amnesia within the interview
Referring to self as “we”
Child-like responses
Sudden technical expertise followed by confusion
Time distortion during the interview
Observe quietly.
Do not draw attention to the shifts. This is essential.
Do not:
Offer explanations
Provide reassurance
Suggest interpretations
Label experiences
Why this matters:
The presenting personality may not be fully integrated
Premature interpretation can contaminate memory
Certain terminology may trigger defensive or shutdown responses
Your role is witnessing and documentation, not meaning-making.
7. Psychological Defense Mechanisms
Alarm Systems are automatic responses triggered when certain topics are approached or when the subject gets too close to protected memories.
May present as:
Sudden headaches or nausea
Overwhelming fatigue
Panic or uncontrollable crying
Urgent need to leave
Abrupt doubt about the therapeutic process
Note the trigger topic and do not push through forcefully.
Booby Traps
These are installed psychological mechanisms designed to prevent memory recovery. They may include: implanted false memories designed to discredit any recovered memories, fear-based programming that associates memory recovery with death or harm to loved ones, confusion programming that makes it impossible to maintain linear thought about certain topics, or pain responses associated with specific memories. In severe cases, suicide programming may be triggered if certain memory compartments are accessed too quickly.
Possible mechanisms include:
Implanted false memories
Fear associations with harm or death
Cognitive confusion loops
Pain responses tied to specific topics
In extreme cases, suicidal ideation may surface if accessed too rapidly.
Cicada Protocols
This term refers to sleeper programming that remains dormant until activated by specific triggers—dates, phrases, locations, or reaching certain ages. Subjects with this type of programming may have entire skill sets, knowledge bases, or personality configurations that emerge only under specific conditions.
Dormant programming activated by:
Dates
Phrases
Locations
Specific gestures
Indicators include:
Sudden disengagement
Knowledge immediately denied afterward
Sleeper Personalities & Handler Structures
Some subjects may have trauma based conditioned personalities specifically designed to interface with handlers—individuals who maintain control and can activate programming. These personalities may:
These may:
Activate defensively during interviews
Redirect conversation subtly
Discourage therapy afterward
Operate outside conscious awareness
Critical Safety Note:
If you suspect active handler involvement, proceed with extreme caution. Consider whether the subject has genuine support systems, whether they are currently in a safe living situation, and whether they have the psychological and practical resources to process what may emerge. Do not proceed with deep memory work if active handler contact is ongoing unless specialized deprogramming support is available.
8. Physical Evidence Documentation
Bodily Marks & Anomalies
Ask neutrally about:
Puncture marks. Specifically in unusual locations (behind ears, roof of mouth, navel, spine, genitals) that appear overnight with no explanation. Note if these occur in geometric patterns or bilateral symmetry.
Bruising. Particularly finger-like marks in places they couldn’t easily self-inflict, bruising in patterns suggesting restraint (wrists, ankles, upper arms), or deep tissue bruising with no impact memory.
Scoop marks. Small, perfectly circular or oval depressions in the skin, usually on legs or arms, that heal with a slight indentation. These often appear suddenly and heal unusually quickly.
Nighttime nosebleeds or traces of blood on the bedding accompanied by sinus pain and pressure.
Unexplained scars
Objects detected on imaging
Gynecological or urological anomalies without clear medical cause
Abnormal healing rates
Document whether they’ve sought medical attention for these marks and what explanations (if any) were provided. Note if doctors seemed dismissive or if medical records from these visits mysteriously disappeared.
9. Additional Safety Considerations
Creating a Safe Container
Before proceeding to actual QHHT sessions, ensure you have:
1. Emergency protocols: Contact information for crisis support, grounding techniques prepared, and understanding of when to stop a session
2. Support system verification: Confirm the subject has trusted individuals who can provide support post-session
3. Environmental safety: Ensure the subject’s living situation is stable and they’re not at risk from others who might be threatened by their memory recovery
4. Professional backup: Have referrals ready for specialists in trauma, dissociation, and if needed, deprogramming support
10. Ethical Boundaries
Your role is facilitation, not validation of any narrative.
Remember that your role is to facilitate healing and truth-seeking, not to prove or disprove any particular narrative. Remain agnostic about the source of trauma while fully honoring that the trauma itself is real to the subject. Whether experiences are literal, metaphorical, screen memories, or a combination, the therapeutic goal remains the same: integration, healing, and empowerment.
Never proceed with memory recovery work on this population without specialized training in trauma-informed therapy and understanding of dissociative disorders. The risk of retraumatization or triggering destabilization is significant and requires skilled navigation.
Never proceed with memory recovery work in this population without advanced trauma-informed training.
The risk of retraumatization is real and requires skilled, ethical navigation.
